For most people, the word “appeal” conjures images of a courtroom drama, impassioned attorneys standing before a panel of judges, making the case for why a lower court got it wrong. While the reality of appellate practice in Indiana is considerably more methodical than what you see on television, there is one stage of the process where advocacy becomes personal, immediate, and undeniably high-stakes: oral argument.
Oral argument in Indiana appeals represents a unique and often pivotal opportunity for attorneys to speak directly with the appellate judges who will decide the case. Unlike a trial, where witnesses testify and evidence is introduced for the first time, an appellate oral argument is a focused conversation about the law. The facts are already established in the record below. The written briefs have been submitted and read. What oral argument provides is something that no written document can fully replicate, a dynamic, real-time exchange in which the judges can ask questions, test legal theories, probe the weaknesses in each side's position, and seek the clarity they need to render a sound decision.
Yet despite its importance, oral argument remains one of the least understood aspects of Indiana appellate practice for many litigants. Not every appeal includes oral argument; in fact, most Indiana appeals are decided on the briefs alone. When oral argument is granted, the stakes are high, and the margin for error is razor-thin. Effective appellate hearing prep, a sound appellate strategy, a compelling court presentation, and skillful rebuttal arguments can meaningfully influence the outcome of the case, or, if handled poorly, squander an opportunity that the court has chosen to provide.
This guide is designed to demystify oral arguments in Indiana appeals. Whether you are a party to an appeal, an attorney preparing for your first argument before the Indiana Court of Appeals or Supreme Court, or simply someone who wants to understand how this critical phase of the appellate process works, the information here will provide the foundation you need.
The Indiana Appellate System: A Brief Overview
Before examining oral argument in detail, it is helpful to understand the structure of Indiana's appellate courts and the general process by which cases move through the system.
Indiana has a two-tier appellate structure. The Indiana Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court. It consists of fifteen judges who sit in panels of three to decide cases. The Court of Appeals has mandatory jurisdiction, meaning it cannot decline to hear an appeal that is properly filed. The vast majority of appeals in Indiana begin and end here.
The Indiana Supreme Court sits above the Court of Appeals and consists of five justices. Unlike the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction over most of the cases it hears, accepting cases through a transfer process when they present issues of particular importance or when there is a need to resolve conflicts in the law.
The appellate process in Indiana begins when a party files a Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court, typically within thirty days of the entry of a final judgment. The record from the trial court is compiled and transmitted to the appellate court. The parties then prepare and file written briefs, the appellant's brief, the appellee's brief, and optionally, a reply brief, which set forth their legal arguments and authorities.
After the briefing is complete, the appeal is assigned to a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals. In many cases, the panel will decide the appeal based solely on the written submissions. In some cases, however, the court determines that oral argument would be helpful, and the case is set for argument. It is at this stage that the principles of appellate strategy, court presentation, and appellate hearing prep become critically important.
What Is Oral Argument in an Indiana Appeal?
Oral argument is a scheduled proceeding in which the attorneys for each party, or unrepresented parties themselves, appear before the appellate panel to present their positions and respond to the judges' questions. It is not a re-trial of the case, not an opportunity to introduce new evidence, and not a time for emotional appeals. It is, at its core, a legal conversation between the advocates and the court.
During oral argument in Indiana appeals, the appellant typically goes first, presenting the core of their argument for why the trial court's decision should be reversed or modified. The appellee follows, defending the trial court's ruling and responding to the appellant's arguments. The appellant may then have an opportunity for rebuttal, a brief response to the appellee's presentation. Throughout the process, the judges actively participate by asking questions, sometimes interrupting counsel mid-sentence to probe a particular point or redirect the discussion toward the issues that matter most to the panel.
The purpose of oral argument is not to rehash everything that has already been said in the written briefs. The judges will have read the briefs before the argument. Rather, oral argument serves several distinct functions. It allows the court to clarify ambiguities in the parties' positions. It gives the judges an opportunity to test the logical and practical implications of each side's legal theories. It enables counsel to emphasize the most critical aspects of their case and to address the court's specific concerns. And it provides a human dimension to the advocacy that written submissions, however well-crafted, cannot fully convey.
For these reasons, oral argument is not merely a formality. When the court has chosen to hear argument, it is because the judges believe that a live exchange will assist them in reaching the right decision. This is both an opportunity and a responsibility, and the quality of the court presentation can make a meaningful difference in the outcome.
When Is Oral Argument Granted?
One of the most important things to understand about oral argument in Indiana appeals is that it is not automatic. Under Indiana Appellate Rule 52(A), the court has discretion to set oral argument on its own initiative or upon a party's motion. Most appeals in Indiana are decided without oral argument, based entirely on the written record and briefs.
The court is most likely to grant oral argument when the case presents novel or complex legal issues, when the written briefs leave unresolved questions that a live exchange might clarify, when the case has significant precedential value, or when the issues are close enough that the panel believes oral argument could tip the balance. Conversely, cases in which the issues are straightforward, the law is well-settled, and the briefs adequately address the relevant points are less likely to receive oral argument.
A party who wishes to request oral argument must file a motion with the appellate court no later than seven days after the date on which a reply brief would be due under Indiana Appellate Rule 45(B). The motion should articulate why the case would benefit from oral argument, not simply assert that the party wants an opportunity to speak, but explain what oral argument would add beyond what the briefs have already provided. A well-reasoned motion for oral argument is itself a component of effective appellate strategy, as it signals to the court that the party has thoughtfully considered the role that argument can play in the resolution of the case.
When oral argument is granted, the Clerk sends an order setting the argument date. Under Indiana Appellate Rule 52(C), counsel of record and unrepresented parties must file a written acknowledgment of the order within fifteen days of service. Failure to properly acknowledge the oral argument setting, or failure to appear, can have negative consequences for the party's position.
The Procedural Framework: Indiana Appellate Rules 52 and 53
The procedural mechanics of oral argument in Indiana are governed primarily by Indiana Appellate Rules 52 and 53. Understanding these rules is essential for any attorney preparing to argue before the Indiana Court of Appeals or Supreme Court.
Rule 52: Setting and Acknowledging Oral Argument. This rule establishes that the court may set oral argument at its discretion and specifies the timeline for requesting argument. It also addresses the acknowledgment requirement, the procedures for cases involving confidential records, and the notification obligations when oral argument is set in a criminal appeal.
Rule 53: Procedures for Oral Argument. This rule governs the conduct of the argument itself. It addresses the order of argument, the appellant proceeds first, followed by the appellee, with the appellant permitted to reserve time for rebuttal. The rule covers time allocation, the participation of amicus curiae, the use of physical objects or visual aids, and the requirements for maintaining the confidentiality of sealed records during public arguments.
In the Court of Appeals, each party is typically allotted twenty to thirty minutes for their presentation. In the Supreme Court, the total argument time is usually forty minutes, divided between the parties. Time is strictly monitored using flash cards or an electronic timing system. When the warning indicator appears, counsel must be prepared to conclude their remarks promptly. When the time-expired signal appears, counsel should finish answering any pending question from the bench, advise the court that their time has expired, and sit down. Continuing to speak after time has run out is both a violation of the rules and a strategic error, it signals a lack of preparation and control.
The appellant may reserve a portion of their allotted time for rebuttal arguments by notifying the court before beginning their initial presentation. This reservation is an important tactical decision, as it provides the appellant with the final word, an opportunity to address the appellee's arguments and leave the panel with a favorable last impression.
Most oral arguments in the Court of Appeals take place in the Court of Appeals courtroom on the fourth floor of the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis. However, the Court also conducts “Appeals on Wheels”, traveling oral arguments held at law schools, universities, high schools, and other venues across the state as part of the court's public education mission. The Supreme Court hears arguments in its courtroom in the Statehouse, and both courts have occasionally used remote technology for oral arguments, particularly since 2020.
Preparing for Oral Argument: Appellate Hearing Prep Essentials
Effective appellate hearing prep is the foundation of a successful oral argument. The best appellate advocates do not simply show up and wing it; they prepare with the same rigor and discipline that went into drafting the written briefs, and then some. The following elements are essential to thorough preparation.
Know the record cold. The appellate court reviews only the record from the proceedings below. During oral argument, the judges may ask about specific facts, procedural history, or details from the transcript. An attorney who cannot answer these questions accurately and immediately loses credibility with the panel. Before the argument, review the entire record, mark key passages in the transcript, and be prepared to direct the court to specific pages and exhibits.
Master the law. Oral argument is a conversation about the law. You must know not only the cases and statutes cited in your brief but also the cases and statutes cited in your opponent's brief, any recent developments in the relevant area of law, and the broader legal principles that underpin your position. Be prepared to discuss how your case fits within the existing framework of precedent and why the result you seek is consistent with sound legal reasoning.
Anticipate the court's questions. This is perhaps the most critical aspect of appellate hearing prep. The judges have read the briefs and have identified the issues that concern them. Think carefully about the weaknesses in your case, the strongest arguments on the other side, and the practical implications of the rule you are asking the court to adopt. Prepare answers to the hardest questions you can imagine, and then prepare answers to questions you have not imagined. Moot court sessions, in which colleagues or fellow attorneys pose questions in a simulated argument setting, are invaluable for this purpose.
Develop an argument outline, not a script. Oral argument should be a flexible conversation, not a memorized speech. Prepare an outline of the key points you want to cover, organized in order of importance, but do not write out a word-for-word script. A scripted presentation prevents you from engaging naturally with the judges and adapting to the flow of the argument. If a judge asks a question that takes you away from your planned sequence, answer the question and then return to the points that remain most important.
Prepare your opening. The first thirty seconds of your argument set the tone for everything that follows. Craft a clear, concise opening statement that tells the court who you are, what the case is about, and why you should prevail. Avoid throat-clearing preliminaries and get to the substance immediately. In the Court of Appeals, the customary opening is to address the panel, identify yourself and your client, and state the central issue or issues in the case.
Know the standard of review. Every issue on appeal is evaluated under a particular standard of review, de novo, clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion, or another applicable standard. The standard of review frames the entire argument and determines how much deference the appellate court gives to the trial court's decision. Be prepared to articulate and apply the correct standard for each issue.
Crafting Your Appellate Strategy for Oral Argument
Appellate strategy for oral argument is not simply a matter of repeating what is in the brief. It requires a thoughtful assessment of what the oral argument can accomplish that the brief alone cannot, and a deliberate plan for using the limited time available to maximum effect.
Identify your strongest arguments and lead with them. Time is finite and interruptions are frequent. You may not have the opportunity to address every point in your brief. Prioritize the one or two arguments that are most likely to win the case and build your presentation around them. If the court is interested in a secondary issue, you can pivot to it when asked, but your affirmative presentation should focus on the arguments that matter most.
Understand what the court needs from you. The judges have already read the briefs. They do not need you to recite the facts or summarize the procedural history at length. What they need is help resolving the legal questions that are difficult or close. Your appellate strategy should be oriented toward providing that help, clarifying the legal standard, distinguishing adverse authority, explaining the practical consequences of the rule you advocate, and addressing the concerns that the judges are likely to have.
Prepare for both the argument you want to give and the argument the court wants to hear. You may walk into the courtroom planning to discuss issue one, only to find that the panel spends the entire argument asking about issue three. Be prepared for this. A rigid insistence on sticking to your script in the face of the court's questions will frustrate the judges and waste your opportunity. Flexibility is not a sign of weakness, it is a hallmark of effective appellate advocacy.
Consider the appellee's perspective. Effective appellate strategy requires anticipating your opponent's best arguments and preparing to address them. If you are the appellant, think about what the appellee will say in response to your points and be ready to counter those arguments, both during your main presentation and in your rebuttal. If you are the appellee, anticipate the strongest version of the appellant's argument and frame your presentation to address it head-on.
Think about the broader implications. Appellate courts make law for future cases, not just the case before them. Judges are keenly aware that the rule they adopt may have consequences beyond the immediate parties. If you can articulate why the result you seek is not only correct in this case but also sound as a general principle, your argument will be more persuasive. Conversely, if the rule your opponent advocates would lead to problematic results in other contexts, point that out.
Develop a theme. The most effective oral arguments are organized around a unifying theme, a single, compelling narrative thread that ties together the facts, the law, and the equities of the case. Your theme should be simple enough to state in one or two sentences and powerful enough to frame the entire argument.
Court Presentation: Delivering an Effective Argument
The substance of your argument is paramount, but the manner in which you deliver it also matters. Court presentation encompasses everything from your physical demeanor and tone of voice to the way you respond to difficult questions and manage your time. The following principles will help you present effectively before an Indiana appellate panel.
Be conversational, not theatrical. Appellate judges are not juries. They are experienced legal professionals who value substance over style. The most effective court presentation is one that feels like a conversation among colleagues, respectful, direct, and focused on the merits. Avoid oratorical flourishes, dramatic pauses, and emotional appeals. Speak clearly, at a measured pace, and with the confidence that comes from thorough preparation.
Answer questions directly. When a judge asks a question, answer it. Do not evade, deflect, or say “I'll get to that in a moment.” The question a judge asks is the most important thing happening in the courtroom at that moment. Provide a direct, honest answer, and then, if necessary, explain or qualify your response. If you do not know the answer, say so, credibility is more valuable than the appearance of omniscience.
Maintain composure under pressure. Judges may ask pointed, skeptical, or even seemingly hostile questions. This is not a sign that you are losing, it is a sign that the judges are engaged and testing your position. Remain calm, respectful, and focused. A composed response to a tough question can be one of the most powerful moments in an oral argument.
Use the lectern effectively. Stand at the lectern, face the judges, and make eye contact. Do not read from your notes for extended periods. Glance at your outline to stay on track, but keep your primary focus on the panel. The argument is a dialogue, and a dialogue requires engagement.
Manage your time strategically. If you are the appellant and have reserved time for rebuttal, be mindful of how much time remains during your main presentation. Do not rush through your most important points to cover everything on your outline. It is better to address two issues thoroughly than to race through four issues superficially. The time management system, whether flash cards or electronic lights, will give you cues. Plan your closing so that you can deliver it naturally when the warning signal appears, rather than being cut off mid-sentence.
Respect the court's protocols. Arrive early. Dress professionally. Silence your phone. Fill out any required forms before the argument begins. Address the judges by their proper titles. Follow the court's guidelines for visual aids, technology, and courtroom behavior. These details may seem minor, but they reflect your professionalism and your respect for the institution.
Close with purpose. Your closing statement is your last opportunity to leave an impression on the panel. Prepare a brief, powerful closing that restates your core theme and clearly articulates the relief you are requesting. If time permits, end with a sentence that crystallizes why the court should rule in your favor.
The Art of Rebuttal Arguments
Rebuttal is the appellant's exclusive privilege and, when used effectively, one of the most powerful tools in appellate advocacy. The appellee does not receive rebuttal time. For the appellant, the decision of whether and how to use rebuttal time is a critical element of appellate strategy.
Reserve rebuttal time. In the Indiana Court of Appeals, the appellant may reserve a portion of their allotted time for rebuttal by submitting a request form prior to the start of the argument. In the Supreme Court, the appellant advises the court before beginning the argument how much time is being reserved. As a general rule, reserving three to five minutes for rebuttal is sufficient. Reserving too much time may shortchange your main presentation; reserving too little may leave you unable to respond meaningfully.
Listen carefully during the appellee's argument. Rebuttal arguments are responsive by nature, they are your opportunity to address the specific points raised by the appellee and the questions the judges posed to the appellee. Take notes during the appellee's argument, paying particular attention to factual inaccuracies, legal mischaracterizations, concessions, and new arguments that were not addressed in the briefs.
Be selective. Rebuttal is not an opportunity to deliver a second main argument. Do not attempt to cover everything the appellee said. Instead, focus on the one or two points that are most damaging to your position if left unanswered. Choose the issues that, if unaddressed, might cause the court to rule against you, and respond to them crisply and directly.
Correct misstatements of fact or law. If the appellee misstated a fact in the record or mischaracterized a legal authority, rebuttal is the appropriate time to set the record straight. A concise, factual correction, delivered without rancor, can be devastatingly effective.
Do not repeat your main argument. The judges have already heard your main presentation. Repeating the same points during rebuttal wastes the court's time and yours. Rebuttal arguments should be fresh, responsive, and targeted.
End strong. Because rebuttal is the last thing the judges hear before they begin deliberating, your closing words carry particular weight. End with a clear, confident statement of why you should prevail. Do not trail off or mumble a concluding pleasantry. Make your final sentence count.
How Judges Use Oral Argument in Their Decision-Making
Understanding how appellate judges use oral argument can inform every aspect of your preparation and court presentation. While every judge is different, several general observations about the judicial perspective are widely shared.
Judges use oral argument to identify and clarify the issues that are most difficult or uncertain. If the briefs have adequately resolved an issue, the judges are unlikely to spend argument time on it. The questions they ask during oral argument are windows into the issues that are giving them pause. For the attentive advocate, these questions are invaluable, they tell you what the court needs to decide the case.
Judges test the logical boundaries of the parties' positions during oral argument. They may pose hypothetical scenarios, ask about the implications of ruling one way or another, or push counsel to articulate the limiting principles of their argument. These questions are not traps, they are efforts to understand the full scope and consequences of the decision the court is being asked to make.
Judges also use oral argument to assess the credibility and reliability of the advocates. An attorney who answers questions honestly, acknowledges weaknesses, and maintains composure under pressure earns the court's trust. An attorney who evades questions, overstates their case, or becomes flustered may undermine even a meritorious position.
After oral argument, the judges on the panel meet to deliberate and assign the opinion. The opinion may go through numerous drafts over a period of weeks or months before it is issued. Cases may be decided unanimously by a three-to-zero vote, or they may be split two-to-one, with a dissenting opinion. The arguments and exchanges that occurred during oral argument often inform the reasoning and analysis in the written opinion, even if the opinion does not explicitly reference the argument.
Common Mistakes to Avoid During Oral Argument
Even experienced appellate attorneys can fall into traps during oral argument. Awareness of the most common mistakes is an essential component of appellate hearing prep.
Reading from a prepared text. Nothing kills the effectiveness of an oral argument faster than reading a speech. The judges can read for themselves, they invited you to argue because they want a conversation. Use an outline, not a script.
Reciting the facts at length. The judges have read the briefs and the record. A brief factual summary may be appropriate, but spending five or ten minutes narrating the procedural history is a waste of precious argument time. Get to the legal issues quickly.
Failing to answer the court's questions. When a judge asks a question, the worst response is to dodge it. Even if the question is difficult, provide an honest answer. Evasion erodes credibility and frustrates the panel.
Arguing with the judges. There is a difference between respectful advocacy and argumentativeness. If a judge disagrees with your position, respond with a clear, reasoned explanation, not with resistance or irritation. You will not win by arguing with the people who will decide your case.
Attacking opposing counsel or the trial court. Indiana's oral argument guidelines specifically caution against personal attacks on the trial court, the parties, or opposing counsel. Keep the focus on the legal merits of the case. Personal attacks are unprofessional and counterproductive.
Ignoring time constraints. When the signal indicates that your time has expired, stop. Continuing to speak after your time is up is disrespectful and reflects poorly on your preparation. Plan your argument so that you can conclude within the allotted time, even if questions from the bench consume more time than expected.
Trying to cover too much ground. Oral argument is not a comprehensive review of every issue in the case. Focus on the most important points and address others only if the court asks. Depth is more valuable than breadth.
Failing to prepare for rebuttal. If you have reserved rebuttal time, use it purposefully. An unfocused or rambling rebuttal, or worse, a rebuttal that simply repeats the main argument, is a missed opportunity. Be prepared to respond to the specific points the appellee raises.
Oral Argument in Family Law and Other Specialized Appeals
Certain types of appeals present unique considerations for oral argument. Family law cases, including disputes over child custody, parenting time, property division, spousal maintenance, and related issues, are among the most common and most complex appeals in Indiana, and they often benefit significantly from oral argument.
Family law appeals are frequently fact-intensive and involve the application of broad, discretionary standards such as the “best interests of the child” or “just and reasonable” property division. Because the trial court's discretion is so broad in these areas, the standard of review is often deferential, making it more challenging to convince the appellate court that reversal is warranted. Oral argument can be particularly valuable in these cases because it allows counsel to walk the panel through the specific factual circumstances that demonstrate an abuse of discretion or a misapplication of the law.
Cases involving complex statutory interpretation, such as the application of Indiana's custody statutes, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, or the calculation of child support, may also benefit from oral argument, particularly when the statutory language is ambiguous or when the case implicates competing policy considerations.
Criminal appeals, administrative appeals, and civil appeals involving unsettled areas of law are other categories in which oral argument is frequently requested and granted. In each of these contexts, the core principles of appellate strategy, appellate hearing prep, effective court presentation, and targeted rebuttal arguments remain the same, but the specific legal frameworks and standards of review require tailored preparation.
Regardless of the subject matter, the key to effective oral argument in any specialized area is the same: thorough preparation, mastery of the record and the law, responsiveness to the court's concerns, and a clear, focused presentation that addresses the issues that will decide the case.
Conclusion
Oral argument in Indiana appeals is far more than a procedural formality. When the court grants argument, it is extending an invitation, an opportunity for the advocates to engage directly with the judges who will decide the case, to clarify the most difficult issues, to address the court's specific concerns, and to make the most persuasive possible case for their clients.
Seizing that opportunity requires rigorous appellate hearing prep, a well-crafted appellate strategy, a polished and professional court presentation, and the ability to deliver sharp, responsive rebuttal arguments. It requires knowing the record inside and out, mastering the relevant law, anticipating the hardest questions, and maintaining composure under pressure. And it requires understanding that oral argument is not a speech, it is a conversation, and the most effective advocates are those who listen as carefully as they speak.
At Ciyou & Associates, P.C., our appellate attorneys bring extensive experience before the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court. We understand the procedural requirements, the strategic considerations, and the practical realities of appellate advocacy in Indiana. Whether your appeal involves family law, civil litigation, criminal law, or any other area, we are prepared to provide the skilled representation that this critical stage of the legal process demands. If you have questions about an appeal or the potential for oral argument in your case, we encourage you to contact our firm for a consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is oral argument required in every Indiana appeal?
No. Under Indiana Appellate Rule 52(A), the court has discretion to set oral argument on its own initiative or upon a party's motion. Most Indiana appeals are decided based on the written briefs alone, without oral argument. Oral argument is typically granted when the case presents complex or novel legal issues, or when the court believes that a live exchange will aid in its decision-making.
How do I request oral argument in my appeal?
A party may file a motion for oral argument with the appellate court. The motion must be filed no later than seven days after the date on which a reply brief would be due. The motion should explain why oral argument would be beneficial, not simply state that the party wants to argue, but articulate what oral argument would add beyond what the written briefs provide.
How much time do I have for oral argument?
In the Indiana Court of Appeals, each party is typically allotted twenty to thirty minutes. In the Indiana Supreme Court, the total argument time is usually forty minutes, divided between the parties. Time is strictly monitored, and attorneys should plan to conclude within the allotted period.
Can I reserve time for rebuttal?
Yes, but only if you are the appellant. In the Court of Appeals, the appellant may request rebuttal time by submitting a form before the argument begins. In the Supreme Court, the appellant advises the court at the start of the argument how much time is being reserved. The appellee does not receive rebuttal time.
What should I expect from the judges during oral argument?
Expect to be interrupted frequently. Appellate judges use oral argument to ask questions, test legal theories, and probe the strengths and weaknesses of each side's position. The questions are not an indication of hostility, they are a sign that the judges are engaged and working through the difficult issues in the case. Be prepared to answer directly and adapt your presentation to the court's interests.
Can I present new evidence during oral argument?
No. Oral argument is limited to the issues and evidence already presented in the written briefs and the trial court record. The appellate court does not conduct a new trial or hear new testimony. The purpose of oral argument is to discuss the legal issues, not to introduce new facts.
Where do oral arguments take place in Indiana?
Most Court of Appeals oral arguments are held in the Court of Appeals courtroom on the fourth floor of the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis. Some arguments are held in the Supreme Court courtroom, also in the Statehouse. The Court of Appeals also conducts traveling oral arguments at venues across the state, including law schools, universities, and high schools. Since 2020, both courts have occasionally used remote technology for oral arguments.
What happens after oral argument?
After oral argument, the judges on the panel meet to deliberate and assign the writing of the opinion. The opinion may go through multiple drafts over a period of weeks or months before a final decision is issued. The court may affirm or reverse the trial court's decision, or it may remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
How can Ciyou & Associates, P.C. help with my appeal?
Our appellate attorneys have significant experience arguing before Indiana's appellate courts. We provide comprehensive appellate representation, from evaluating the merits of a potential appeal to drafting briefs, preparing for oral argument, and advocating before the court. We bring the strategic insight, thorough preparation, and professional advocacy that effective appellate practice requires. Contact us to discuss your case and learn how we can help.
This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every appeal presents unique issues and circumstances. For guidance tailored to your specific case, consult with a qualified Indiana appellate attorney at Ciyou & Associates, P.C.
